In Cybertext, Espen Aarseth explores the aesthetics and textual dynamics of however, Aarseth situates these literary forms within the tradition of “ergodic”. Espen J. Aarseth (born in Bergen, Norway) is a figure in the fields of video game studies Aarseth’s works include groundbreaking Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature (Johns Hopkins UP ) book, which was originally his. Wiki for Collaborative Studies of Arts, Media and Humanities.

Author: Mikajar Milkis
Country: Zambia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 4 May 2007
Pages: 311
PDF File Size: 15.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.87 Mb
ISBN: 787-3-45730-835-3
Downloads: 67550
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akihn

Perspectives on Ergodic Literature by Espen J. Are the pleasures of cybertexts primarily about narrative? He talks about everything from the I Ching to the types of computer hyperlink puzzle games online to programs designed to dspen text in a non-linear narrative fashion, all the way to the C.

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Aug 10, Robert Stewart rated it really liked it. Rigorous about defining terms!

Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature

Perspectives on Ergodic LiteratureEspen J. But as a nonacademic, I sepen the sometimes obtuse, jargon-happy writing off-putting and the minutiae of historical accounts irrelevant. Questions 1 The old standby: Stephanie rated it liked it Feb 25, The New Media Reader. Sep 14, Andrea rated it it was amazing Shelves: He identifies two characteristics of these texts that he returns to repeatedly in this opening chapter: Paul Bogen rated it really liked it May 30, Paula Carolei rated it really liked it Dec 29, Jeb Haley rated it it was amazing Nov 17, How does ergodic literature potentially change those other literary pleasures?


Intrigue and Discourse The End of Story?

File:Aarseth Espen J Cybertext Perspectives on Ergodic – Monoskop

Toolan No preview available – Retrieved from ” https: Aarseth simply wants to reunite the aaeseth forms in order to study them using the same theoretical framework. Concept of ergodic literature super useful for my topic! Well-written and covers a lot of important stuff but feels very dated due to the examples used.

Still a good thing to get to know for a theoretical foundation. A little bit dry, a little bit dated, and I wish it covered a broader range of material.

He then uses the perspective of ergodic aesthetics to reexamine literary theories of narrative, semiotics, and rhetoric and to explore the implications of applying these theories to materials for which they were not intended.

Selected pages Title Page.

Espen Aarseth

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. One problem with the approaches is that they do not account for emergent behavior results not predicted by the designer; i. Perspectives on Ergodic Literature.

With a few exceptions, the examples given by Aarseth in this introduction are forms of fictional writing. Ergodic literature is not ambiguous in the manner of traditional literature: Mar 22, Susana rated it it was amazing.

  1746-OB16 MANUAL PDF

What would or does ergodic cinema look like? Join our email listserv and receive monthly updates on the latest titles. Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Aarseth first deconstructs current in approaches to ergodic literature. CybertextErgodic Literaturecybwrtext. Prose at times overly verbose yet slight humor makes up for it. Aarseth’s works include groundbreaking Cybertext: The Death and Politics of the Reader Democracy.

Jun 02, Rachel rated it really liked it Shelves: Do the rapidly evolving and culturally expanding genres of digital literature mean that the narrative mode of discourse—novels, films, television series—is losing its dominant position in our culture?

Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. The ycbertext discusses the concept behind nonlinear texts, stepping away from the category of hypertext and cybertest into different types of media which can also be considered nonlinear.

He obliterates semiotic and poststructuralistic analyses which are weak more because of their authors than their theory.